Posts Tagged ‘Rant’

Review of the iPlayer – Round two (does it still judder?)

Sunday, January 18th, 2009

This seems like a good time to write another iPlayer review, after all, they’ve had some time and I have a new computer. What’s changed?

So, let’s look at what we said last time.

Good

  • No advertisements (other than a brief channel trailer which doesn’t really count).
  • Good quality, especially for so called ’standard definition’.
  • Generally fast play.
  • Done with flash, pretty much universal.

Bad

  • Bandwidth heavy.
  • No live viewing.
  • Some issues with the video.
  • Only seven days of watching time.
  • Awful problems with full screen play.

The thing is that I now have a computer which is almost as good as my Dad’s media machine. This means that I can experiment more, but it doesn’t mean that I have something more powerful than the box I tested it on before (although the screen is a tad smaller).

However, Auntie has had a chance to get her act together and upgrade/advance the iPlayer. This seems to have resulted in some serious interface changes and the new high definition version.

I don’t have time to write a full review at the moment but here’s my summary:

Bad to good

  • With the introduction of the HD version bandwidth seems to have dropped for the non-HD media, unfortunately so has quality (see below).
  • Since my last exploration I’ve found some programs and libraries which allow iPlayer downloading.
  • It would seem that more and more applications are supporting the iPlayer (Boxee and XBMC).

Good to bad

  • The quality before HD was very good on normal recordings. It would seem that with HD’s introduction the SD (standard definition) media is lower quality and in general more flaky.

New bad

  • Over the last few weeks I’ve encountered a few video bugs, mostly involving jerks or artifacts.
  • Occasionally the video decides to scramble audio and play at ten times speed, similar things happened before but this is worse.
  • I’ve started to notice that very little of the audio is normalised, I have to adjust my amp a lot.
  • Contrast and brightness differences, hitting ‘auto calibrate’ a lot on my screen isn’t much fun.

New good

  • The HD version is very nice and the content very crisp.
  • There is a growing number of devices which support the iPlayer.
  • The ability to pause, then resume the next time you open your browser (it remembers where you were), a small but important improvement.
  • Wider range of Programme avaliability.
  • I can generally get jerk-less full screen playback on my box. I have yet to purchase a non-integrated graphics card so this is impressive (I have a NVIDIA internal at the moment).

Still good

  • No advertisements. Even with things like Heroes there are no advertisements, the most you get is a channel/producer trailer.
  • Audio on both SD and HD is crisp and clear.
  • Generally very good avaliability.
  • Generally fast play.
  • Good support for most normal computers.

Still bad

  • No live viewing that I can find.
  • Limited time to watch.
  • Strange problems with full screen, sometimes on some computers with some definitions. They’ve certainly fixed it for some situations.

I think that  covers just about everything, feel free to comment with your own opinions.

Kind regards, Robert.

  • Share/Bookmark

The iPlayer

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

I think most people who’ve been following the iPlayer in any depth have noticed that it’s not really delivering. It has some good sides, but there are a fair few things that I’d like to take issue with.

BBC iPlayer main page

I would not say it’s been a complete waste of money, it hasn’t. It provides videos to anyone within a certain part of the desktop market’s spectrum. So, what’s bad about it? Primarily, you may not download the videos if you’re on anything other than Windows. Isn’t this government backing of a monopoly? Annoyingly the online viewing is only available for 6 days, and even if you do find that old XP disk you’ll only be able to keep the videos for 30 days. So much for asking your neighbours to download a year’s worth of East Enders for you while you’re off on that gap year in Tibet.

BBC iPlayer shows it’s true colours.

So, if you use Linux and you’re away from a computer for more than 7 days, tough.

It does provide some good quality video, the screen shot above shows a similar quality to what you’ll generally get. How much of a good thing is this though? If we dub this ‘high definition’, where’s the standard definition or low definition version for those of us on slower and more expensive connections?

Whatever codec they’re using (I haven’t researched, maybe someone can fill me in) seems to be quite high on the bandwidth usage. They also don’t seem to be using the standard method of scaling videos; normally videos will scale nicely to full screen on any of my computers (on youtube and the like), iPlayer doesn’t. I get skips, jumps, hops and judders if I try to full screen it. I’ve tested it on this machine (1.7GHz, 1GB), my other laptop (1.6GHz, 2GB), and my dad’s media machine (2x 2.6GHz, 2GB). All had problems.

It also has a habit of killing itself out of the blue. This generally manifests itself in one of several ways:

  • ‘There has been a problem playing this video…’ This tends to happen when you walk away for a while and then come back.
  • ‘Undefined undefined undefined’ This has only ever happened once, but I presume heavier users get it more often.
  • The jitters. This is when suddenly everything goes jittery, something like a deliberate echo 0.5s after and at the same volume.
  • The express joo-jars. An apt nickname for when it goes into super fast mode and does something weird with the sound.

BBC iPlayer dies!

BBC iPlayer dies again!

In general it behaves, but I’ve noticed a few other distinct problems:

  • Incomplete uploads. An absolute curse, generally it will finish just before the bit which finalises the whole program.
  • Time delay. For some reason they seem to forget to upload half the days programs for a while, perfectly OK until you want to watch one which is missing.

All in all though, it’s not all bad. I’ll try a comparison with a competitor, ITV’s catchup.

Downloads: [BBC] Yes, only Windows and for 30 days. [ITV] No, or invisible.

Video quality: High, sharp and generally smooth. Nasty.

Adverts: None, just a channel trailer at the beginning. Lots.

Requirements: Flash and a browser. Internet Explorer, a ‘patched’ Windows Media Player, ActiveX.

Speed: Fast. Slow to start with then seems to be buffered and OK.

Watching live: No known mechanism. Possible, reasonable quality.

At the end of the day, does it let me watch Dr Who? Yes, therefore it can’t be all bad.

Kind regards, Robert.

  • Share/Bookmark

Mummy! I want to be stupid when I grow up!

Sunday, December 9th, 2007

I’m scared. I suppose this doesn’t have quite the impact due to my rather bad paranoia, but it should.

I’ve recently spoken to children who actually told me that they wanted to be stupid. No, I’m not joking. No, these weren’t children who were in any way stupid or mentally challenged. Yes, I really am scared.

How is it that someone could honestly desire to be stupid? Children in Africa pray for school, they love it, they walk miles and miles for school just to learn a little. Apparently it’s out of fashion to like school in the wonderful civilised West. Apparently it no longer matters how we speak on the Internet, we can be guilty of shortening words, of using the wrong words and even worse and it not matter. I beg to differ. Actually, I don’t beg, I differ even if you don’t like it. I despise this ‘phonetic English’, moreover because I do not believe that it’s a true representation of the differences between words. There are many more vowels than there are in the alphabet, or we would have no need for vowel combinations. To simplify the orthographic representation of a language which is already absurdly simplified in it’s correct form must be pure folly. It’s a shame that the perpetrators often do not understand that they use words which already exist and so make their sentences ambiguous, even more that they probably don’t know what ambiguous means.

However, our lingual culture is not the only thing which is being attacked; learning other languages, mathematics, history, the sciences, etcetera. Why is it that we consider it our holy right to force our language on others without even beginning to learn theirs? What’s more it seems we require them – if they are to be foolish enough to stumble onto our Internet – to understand our slang and misappropriation of words. It’s little wonder that French workers are notorious for pretending not to understand English, when they’re having to put up with a barrage of media and culture which gives little heed to them or their wishes and furthermore often uses them and other ‘foreign’ cultures as objects of mockery. In fact, how can we be surprised that this does indeed cause anger and distaste. Just look at the way that many tourists act, many take drunk and disorderly to a whole new level.

Although at times maths is hard, often taxing and mostly seems directly irrelevant to you and the rest of your life it has more benefits than you may have thought. A little thought brings me to the conclusion that you probably already know this, as you are still reading. Doing maths helps keep certain parts of your mind active, those logical parts which help you on a daily basis. If you’ve ever done weights you’ll know that being able to lift heavier weights makes smaller weights a lot easier. The same works with maths, the bigger and more complex mathematics you can do the faster and easier you can do the simple stuff. Those areas of your brain are more exercised and handle the small jobs faster. Not everyone uses all parts of advanced mathematics, but a lot of people use areas of it.

As humans we have a considerable list of large mistakes to our names. Many of them involve not learning from previous mistakes, this is something we’re very good at. The old adage of putting your hand in the fire and not getting burnt may work on an individual basis but does not appear to work on a collective level. In spite of this history is apparently ‘becoming irrelevant to everyday life’, even though watching today’s events we see historic events playing out again. Nationalism becoming support for Nazi-like governments, laws designed to protect us being used against us, and giving up our ‘liberties’ for the promise of ‘freedom’. Until we learn from the lessons of the past we must appreciate that history is a lesson we cannot forget.

We trust scientists and technical engineers for our everyday wants and needs. We trust medical science to keep us alive, we trust mechanical and structural engineers to keep us on the road and from being crushed by our homes and places of work, we trust software engineers with our daily schedule. Why then is it that we still label these people ‘geeks’ and ‘nerds’ and despise them for it? The age we live in is becoming increasingly IT based yet anyone who knows much more than how to turn on a PC can become the target of ridicule. Those who chose to study the area are often lacking in basic skills, take a class of young IT students and ask them to build you a PC and you’ll understand what I mean. How can it be possible that anyone should wish to drop these sciences from our curricular?

I feel that part of the problem could be in the media they are fed, it is considered possible for someone who understands little about life and is in all other fields completely useless to become a ‘celebrity’. This becomes the aim of many people, and so a something-for-nothing culture has become rife. Thank God (or possibly Satan) for Simon Cowell.

YouTube Preview Image

So, please, instil in any children you meet a need to push their boundaries and really learn something. Pop stars may have their place, but we can’t all be famous and stupid.

Kind regards, Robert.

  • Share/Bookmark

Addressing the issue of the over active ego in one of my readers.

Tuesday, October 30th, 2007

This is going to be a bit of an open response to a message I received on MySpace. As the message was not open I cannot provide absolute proof of it’s existence, but I know that you’ll trust me.

“i’ve got a question to ask you about that have you ever been laid? with a woman? you big gay twat” Wilmur

I will not release my full attention or energy in response, but I do feel it necessary to address this and such similar attacks. This has not been the only of such, I believe the homophobic community must be passing this around or maybe linking to it within their weekly newsletter.

Before I address any issues raised in or by this correspondence it does strike me that the sender must either have not read my blog, or been heavily under the influence of some mind numbing drug at the time. The entire blog was not about the act of sexual intercourse, foreplay, or anything pertaining to such actions; it was about the use of sexual attraction and visual/verbal sexual manipulation within advertisements and popular culture. For those of you who’d like to totally dismiss this as nonsensical, I’d prefer to address this form of address before it becomes too commonplace within my new mail. I am also amused to find that sexuality is brought into this, did the author read more than the title before realising it as a way to display his own insecurities on a public medium? This I expect will remain a secret.

I will not address the issue of the correspondent’s sexuality, if they’re a latent homosexual and this is the way they chose to show it then that is entirely their business and not mine to pry into. I will not address their interesting grammar, nor the lack of capitalisation but simply presume they’ve broken their shift key and were in great hurry for their life.

Maybe it is that they don’t understand my post, maybe they cant comprehend the meaning of ’sexing’ or how things can be sold using a sexual image. Surely this cannot be so, they had a public school (that’s paid for those outside the UK) education of a genuinely good quality. I would not be surprised if they got higher marks than yours truly, my English skills have always been lacking. Surely they must have been able to understand the simple concept of sex in advertising.

The correspondent asks me if I’ve ever had sex with someone. I must remind them that this is none of their business, apart from being totally irrelevant to the post. They then go on to ask if, if the first question was answered yes, it was a member of the fair sex. They then accuse me of being gay and a `twat`. Gay I take to mean homosexual, and `twat` to mean fool; the other alternative is unlikely even in the context of the absurdity of the post, it being a happy vulva. I’ll let my friends judge me on my foolishness, but I’m most definitely heterosexual. Even if I were, what would be the problem, would there even be any change to the validity of my points of view? This strikes me as the stereotypical accusation of a young man being ‘gay’ because he cries at his wedding, his wedding to a woman, rather petty.

In conclusion I find this attack rather laughable. It’s badly worded and badly punctuated, it’s lacking in substance, it totally lacks factual backing or grounding for the accusations. It is unfortunate that I’ve received a few other similar emails or messages, it’s sad that even in this day of ‘freedom’ and ‘equality’ a man cannot stand up for what he believes to be right, and stand against something he believes to be another’s disgrace without attracting insults. Of course, it has to be the age old accusation of homosexuality.

How pathetic.

Kind regards, Robert.

  • Share/Bookmark

A sign of the times.

Monday, October 29th, 2007

The postman whistles as he walks down the path, knocks three times and presents the occupant with their post. He declines the cup of tea and returns to his bicycle to continue down the lane. Arriving at the gate he enters the next house, inspects a new baby and incurs a cup of tea. Three doors down he informs old Mrs Wilkinson of the new baby’s name and tell her of the latest plans for the cathedral in Rochester. He meets everyone with their post and a brief friendly conversation, in fact, the entire local community is held together by the postman. He carries local news around and provides a daily visitor to the aged.

I’ve only ever twice spoken to my post woman, both times were a result of  her trying to avoid being involved with her duty of delivering the post. I’ve many a time caught her, or some other worker attempting to avoid presenting me with my post. For some reason they prefer to write out a slip telling me that they don’t think I’m there without bothering to try the bell. It’s a sign of the times. No longer is there a vibrant community between the men and women who stay at home, in fact, rarely is anyone at home between nine and twelve. No longer does the postman share information or make light upon days of the aged and infirm.

Indeed, the world of malady is shown through the lack of conversation with the deliverer of the post.

Kind regards, Robert.

  • Share/Bookmark

Don’t worry, attacking a dying woman is only three years.

Friday, October 26th, 2007

‘A man who urinated on a woman as she lay dying and shouted “this is YouTube material” has been sentenced to three years in prison.’ bbc.co.uk report, thanks Auntie.

Listening to this BBC report on the radio I contemplated what a sick society we live in; however, my incredulity was not tried enough, yet. I was only half listening to the news now, imagining the woman’s humiliation as the man covered her in shaving foam and urinated on her. I can hardly imagine a more terrible scene of death.

Given in his defense is that he was under the influence of marijuana and alcohol. This is no defense, surely the court is meant to measure out judgment as some level of compensation for the man’s actions; his state of intoxication makes no difference to the crime from the victims end, not only did he not help or phone for help he gloried in making her last moments as close to hell as possible. He may feel that it’s YouTube material, but I feel that it’s more than a valid excuse to lock him up for many years. That he was a former soldier makes this crime even more horrific, this man was trained to help in extreme danger zones and impartially remove resistance with an aim to preserve human life, it would seem that dialing 999 (the emergency services) was too much for one of such high caliber.

‘A director who presided over redundancies as she swindled money from a company to support a lavish lifestyle has been jailed for five years.’ bbc.co.uk report, thanks again Beeb

As I said, my mind had taken precedent over my ears as I mused over this terrible incident, however, one thing was left to shake me to the core. It would appear that the courts in this country value corporate theft above the defilement of and failing to aid a distressed and dying woman. Gentle reader, I do not intend to be judge, jury and executioner; I have no intent nor the pretension to believe I have any right or even the ability. However, I do feel a deep resentment and what I can only describe as riotous wrath that the legal system should treat someone in this way.

I’m unsure what can be done to rectify this situation, after all, past experience would bring me to believe that it’s only one of many. Past experience would also bring me to believe that we are probably not told everything which we might be and would need to be to discover the true state of affairs, however, I still express my genuine outrage at what seems to be a great injustice.

Yours, disgusted, Robert.

Edit 01:27 27 Oct: Fixed more to Valtr0n’s liking ;)

  • Share/Bookmark

I don’t buy sex.

Friday, October 26th, 2007

In most countries it is illegal to sell sex; in some the law is reversed and it illegal to buy sex.

Everyone has seen the adverts, you know the ones, pretty women photographed next to the product or even using it. I have no objection to the choice of good looking participants for adverts; what I object to is the use of this when, as is increasingly common, the pretty woman is totally irrelevant. I’m sorry if I’m incorrect but there’s no connection I’ve discovered between the undressed female form and web hosting, or fishing nets.

I also object, quite strongly, to the ’sexing’ of music and music videos. Rap, notorious for this, is well known to objectify women and glorify gangsterism. I believe that the ‘armies’ based around various rebel forces in Africa often use ‘gangster rap’ to give their child soldiers the confidence to follow the orders they’re given. Studies have shown that heavy bass beats in music increases testosterone levels, this would be excellent for someone about to make young children shoot up villages. It would also create a heightened level of all the bad sides of masculinity within the children, is it any wonder that they rape and massacrer? I dislike the trend to take this form of film making over into the rest of the music industry, not that I liked the music industry in the first place, I dislike the use of women as objects; in fact, I consider it to be an attempt to manipulate me.

The reason I think that the criticism or abuse of others is so attractive to some is as follows; to be above others (rightly or wrongly) one must create a difference between yourself and them, this can be done by their failing or by your success. If you push them down then you help them fail by your perception, you are now – in your own mind – bigger than they. I hope this makes sense, I’ll probably explain more about it another time, this is getting on for two in the morning and my mind has ceased working according to the normal constraints of ordered thinking. This goes for the objectification of women by men, mostly men who have little self worth; by pushing others beneath them they have greater self worth. It’s sick.

So why did I say that I considered it to be an attempt to manipulate me? Well, if I believe what I’ve already stated then it’s an attempt to make me feel good about myself and buy their music because it does so; they’ve failed as it only serves to make me even more sick of modern ‘culture’ than I was before. If I do not become entwined in their net by this devious trick they have a backup plan up their sleeve, simply lure my interest with sex.

But over all, I find it disturbing that to make me buy a fishing net, a new film, or maybe a cup of coffee I must be lured in by the attraction of sex. Whatever happened to the appeal of wanting to buy a product?

Kindest regards, Robert.

  • Share/Bookmark